VERIFIED CASE STUDY · ADAMDESGNS.COM
REAL AUDIT. REAL REPAIR. RECEIPTS INCLUDED.
From eight dead links to a working project funnel.
SiteProof inspected the live page, ranked 12 confirmed issues, repaired the real source, deployed it, verified the production form, and rescanned the same website. Two problems remain visible because proof is more useful when it stays honest.
BEFORE · WEAK49/ 100
LIVE AFTER · SOLID78/ 100
A 29-point audit-score change. Not a claim of conversion or revenue lift.
THE VISIBLE CHANGE
The personality stayed. The confusion did not.
THE CONVERSION PATH
Email-only contact became a real project brief.
WHAT SITEPROOF DID
The report became the repair plan.
Captured production
Desktop and mobile states, page structure, important controls, and every high-intent destination were recorded before editing.
Ranked the failures
Twelve confirmed issues were separated by severity, with the exact evidence and a concrete repair for each.
Repaired the real source
The original design stayed intact while dead links, vague support copy, contact friction, mobile overlap, and accessibility failures were fixed.
Verified production
The live form recorded a labeled test, all ten outbound destinations returned 200, and the same desktop/mobile checks were repeated.
SCORE BREAKDOWN
Where the 29 points came from.
AREABEFORELIVE AFTER
Offer clarity10 / 2016 / 20
Trust and proof11 / 2011 / 20
Conversion path7 / 2017 / 20
Mobile usability12 / 2016 / 20
Accessibility9 / 2018 / 20
TOTAL49 / 10078 / 100
ALL 12 FINDINGS
What closed—and what did not.
Eight high-intent links led to missing pages
All ten current outbound destinations return 200.
The hero did not state a specific offer
The supporting copy now names the work, buyer, and intended result.
Several funnels competed on one page
Primary actions converge on one form; the long catalog remains.
The main path depended on Yahoo mailto links
The branded Netlify form is primary and records submissions.
Independent customer outcomes were absent
Real customer evidence is still required.
The product catalog was too long
This needs a separate information-architecture decision.
The chat launcher covered mobile content
The launcher is hidden at the audited mobile breakpoint.
Secondary copy failed the contrast check
The audited value moved from about 3.17:1 to 5.59:1.
Mobile controls were undersized
The final check found no visible target below 44 px.
Motion ignored reduced-motion preferences
Reduced-motion handling is live.
Keyboard users had no skip link
A keyboard-visible skip link is live.
Status labels still led to dead ends
Unavailable products use honest access actions routed to the form.
PRODUCTION RECEIPTS
The form did not merely look finished.
Netlify registered the six-field form with honeypot protection. The real browser flow showed the success state, cleared the fields, and created production submission 6a8296b60e382ca4fcb3e8be.
- 10 / 10 outbound destinations returned 200
- 0 known dead high-intent links
- 0 known mobile controls below 44 px
- 5.59:1 audited text contrast
- 0 fresh production browser errors
- 4 / 4 repair regression tests passed
WHAT THIS DOES NOT PROVE
No fake lift percentage. No victory lap over two open issues.
The repair is live and the form works, but that does not prove more leads, more sales, or revenue lift. Adam Designs still needs independent customer outcomes, and the homepage catalog is still long. SiteProof keeps those limits beside the result instead of hiding them in fine print.
YOUR WEBSITE GETS THE SAME EVIDENCE STANDARD.